Continuum beliefs and schizophrenia stigma: Correlational and experimental evidence.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Continuum beliefs in the stigma process regarding persons with schizophrenia and depression: results of path analyses
BACKGROUND Individuals with mental illness often experience stigmatization and encounter stereotypes such as being dangerous or unpredictable. To further improve measures against psychiatric stigma, it is of importance to understand its components. In this study, we attend to the step of separation between "us" and "them" in the stigma process as conceptualized by Link and Phelan. In using the ...
متن کاملCan people really "laugh at themselves?"--experimental and correlational evidence.
Laughing at oneself is considered a core component of the sense of humor in the theories of several authors. In McGhee's (1996) eight-step-training program of the sense of humor, laughing at oneself constitutes one of the most difficult levels. However, until now, only little empirical evidence on laughing at oneself exists. Using a multimethod approach, in the current study, 70 psychology stud...
متن کاملthe relationship between efl learners linguistic and logical intelligence and the frequency and types of informal fallacies and evidence in argumentative writing
مطالعه حاضر با هدف بررسی وجود رابطه ی ممکن میان هوشهای زبانی و منطقی زبان آموزان انگلیسی و تعداد و انواع مغلطه های زبانی و شواهد در متنهای استدلالی آنان انجام پذیرفته است.بدین منظور، 70 زبان آموز با سطح زبانی متوسط به بالا از دو موسسه زبان انگلیسی در ایران انتخاب شده و پرسشنامه های مزبوطه را تکمیل نموده و متنی استدلالی نوشتند. متون نوشته شده مورد بررسی قرار گرفته و نمرات پرسشنامه ها محاسبه شده ...
15 صفحه اولImplicit negotiation beliefs and performance: experimental and longitudinal evidence.
The authors argue that implicit negotiation beliefs, which speak to the expected malleability of negotiating ability, affect performance in dyadic negotiations. They expected negotiators who believe negotiating attributes are malleable (incremental theorists) to outperform negotiators who believe negotiating attributes are fixed (entity theorists). In Study 1, they gathered evidence of converge...
متن کاملRationality and Consistent Beliefs: Theory and Experimental Evidence
This is an investigation into the behavioral and experimental support for different epistemic conditions that together imply that players are to play according to Nash equilibrium. It employs strategic choice data from a carefully chosen set of ring-network games to obtain individual-level estimates of the following three epistemic conditions: rationality; beliefs about the rationality of other...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Stigma and Health
سال: 2017
ISSN: 2376-6964,2376-6972
DOI: 10.1037/sah0000061